I ran into this and it looked very appealing, but I was wondering if it could be driven by my macbook and what would happend when the native resolution (3440 x 1440) is scaled down to 2560 by 1600.Īny alternaive suggestion is more then welcome.
future proof, next year I will probably buy a new MacBook Pro and I assume external screen resolution will be much higher. preferably support thunderbolt (for video and periferial connectivity) can run 2560 by 1600 at least at some kind of native resolution (don't want that ugly effect I get when I scale my MacBook Pro to a lower resolution) Join us tomorrow for Mac Pro 2013 Tech Series Part 5: PCIe cards, expansion chassis and other peripherals. Given lack of space in my home office, I will probably use a vertical henge docks and one single external display.Ĭan anybody suggest a very good display, at least 27', but better 29', 30' or 34' with following requirements: To use an iMac in Target Display Mode when connected to an Apple Thunderbolt Display, the iMac must be Thunderbolt-enabled, and a Thunderbolt cable must be used (not a mini-DP cable). What I understand is that the internal display has a native resolution of 2880-by-1800 and in addition to that, the graphic card can drive up to 2560 by 1600 pixels on up to two external displays. For the first time I am looking in investing money in a very nice external display to connect to my MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Early 2013).
